|
I would like to
start by saying that, because I mixed up the nights and was unable to go on
the night for which I had a ticket, I had to opt for a seat near the back on
the night that I could go. However, this proved to be a very good test of
quality of a show given the hall with its flat floor and flat, low stage
The programme was typical of the care taken over the production – it wasn’t
just a piece of scrappy A4.
I was pleased to see the tabs open – it is nice for the audience to have a
view other than blue tabs, although the set could have been lit. The set was
very good indeed, using a colour of the early 60s - garish orange? My only
minor query was about the flatness of the colour and whether the wall might
have had some texture or character added.
The style was just right - both the era and the necessary exaggeration. I
liked the signs spreading outside the proscenium arch, NY view, the clock
with the moving hands - big exaggerated & bold! Perhaps there could have
been more of a transformation in Act 2 to reflect the improvement in
Mushnik’s business.
The stage was crowded in the chorus numbers – perhaps the stage could have
been extended.
Props were great - body parts and the nitrous oxide helmet were particular
favourites.
Costumes were also good - from Seymour's suitably geeky tank top to the men
and women in white coats at the end. I particularly liked the various
colourful transformations of the girl group - especially the sparkly purple
frocks.
Lighting served its purpose well. I particularly liked the special on the
clock, completely unrealistic and completely right for the show. The lights
closed in very nicely in the Act 2 duet with Seymour and Audrey.
I was hard to do anything but praise the music – a small, tight band who
played well. The balance between band and singers using radio mikes was
fine. I would, however, have liked to have seen the band out front,
especially in this style of show.
The choreography was effective. On a small, crowded stage it was simple and
stylised. I especially liked the different movements of the different groups
in “Skid Row”.
There were no weak links in the performance. American accents ranged from
sound to very authentic NY. The diction was clear and the volume excellent,
even in Row N! I heard every spoken word and most of the words of the songs
too. Lots of Brownie points for actors and director. The chorus had plenty
of attack - loud and vigorous and good to listen to. Quite a wide range of
contrasting and tuneful solo voices; for example, there were some nice cameo
performances in “The Meek Shall Inherit”.
The trio - Chiffon, Crystal and Ronette - all sang and acted well. Their
voices were all quite different but I didn't think that mattered. They
didn't smile much - slightly sinister effect?
One of the first characters we see is Mushnik. Richard's clarity and volume
were impressive throughout. He sang well and I certainly got some sense of
Mushnik's selfishness and self-centredness.
The dentist - John Bohan is a big actor in every sense - dominated the stage
from the moment he entered, good accent, very good singer, played the
villain with great attack and pace and energy. I really enjoyed his
performance - he hit exactly the right note for the role and the style of
the piece. I was sorry to see him eaten.
Will was a terrific nerd….. as Seymour - a very strong performance. Hang on
to him if you can - young men who can act and sing are like gold dust.
Jane Maisey as Audrey was first class - totally in character, nice comic
touches and a beautiful singing voice - a real pleasure to listen to.
“Somewhere That's Green” and “Suddenly Seymour” with Will and the backing
trio, were two songs I particularly enjoyed.
Last but by no means - the plant. I don't know how you did it but I really
believed the plant could speak and sing. Full marks to the various operators
and of course to Simon - was the booming deep southern voice stolen? It
doesn't matter, it was great - a shorthand way of giving the plant character
- worked superbly.
I genuinely enjoyed the show. Act 1 was perhaps a little stronger than Act 2
, but that may be more in the writing than the performance - but refreshing
to see a musical end unsentimentally with both the romantic leads dead!
This was a well directed show. Chrissy Watson has succeeded in drawing out
strong performances from chorus and principals. She got the basics right -
volume and clarity, the show had pace, energy and vigour. All the elements
were well co-ordinated and served each other well. The style, both of
playing and visually, was right and above all, the attention to detail .
Going the extra distance has paid off.
Top of page |
